.jump-link{ display:none }

Sunday 11 November 2018

Poem: His Smile

Richard Lusimbo Umulugele - Ugandan Human Rights Activist





His Smile,
A radiant moon
Gracing a sunny face
Courting my queer heart.
The crinkle under the eyes
Dazing my wandering gaze,
Causing my eyes to twinkle
And my heart to winkle.
Now my lips stretch
From ear to ear.
My smile.

- End -

Happy Birthday Richard Lusimbo Umulugele, this 11th November! Your smile is a blessing to the rainbow children.

About the Poem

This poem is specially written for my rainbow brother Richard Lusimbo Umulugele. It is a revised edition of the first poem, “His Smile” which I wrote and dedicated to him many years ago after I met him. This was the first poem exploring my homoerotic feelings. 

Friday 6 July 2018

Infamous Marteen Ssempa Calls Jesus a Witch!



Emmanuel: 2 1-35 WWJDV

2 Mary pleaded with the men of Wakandah saying, “I forbid that you should break into the house and harm my guests for I have taken them in to protect them. 2But soon, the door succumbed to the weight of the angry mob, and the prince dashed into Kiyemba’s arms for protection.

3Mary entreated the men from the depth of her soul saying, “Please I beg you, do not do any vile thing.”  4But the men of Wakandah pushed her away, shoved the inseparable lads out of the house, forced them on the ground and flogged them with all the strength in their arms.

5Death courted the souls of the lads and their woeful cry echoed in the valleys of the hills. 6Suddenly, a strong voice cried out, “Why do you do this to my body?” 7Bahati and his men were surprised to hear the voice so they stopped and looked at each other in shock, because they did not see who said the words.

8So Bahati shouted to his men, “By order of King Mwanda, we have to beat the demons out of these swine who bring shame to our nation because they lie with each other!” 9So he commanded them to resume the flogging. 10But a man with a thick flowing beard had suddenly thrust himself to protect the lads before Bahati issued the order, so that the whips landed against his small body instead. 11Strangely, every club that struck him broke into two and the flogger’s hand became limp.

12Among the crowd that had gathered because of the woeful cry of the lads, was a man called Christopher. He saw the strange thing that happened. 13When he looked keenly at the lads’ protector, he saw that there were holes in the palms of both his hands and in his feet.

14The protective man said, “I ask again, why do you do this to my body?” 15Bahati scoffed and retorted, “Who are you to come in the way of the mighty king’s men?” 16And the man replied, “Who do you think it is that speaks to you?”

17Bahati replied, “You are the devil. It is a law in the holy book that a man shall not lie with another man; the way of these pigs is not the way of the men of Wakandah”. 18His mob spat on the man and the lads, and shouted, “God forbid that we shall let these perverts breathe the air we breathe”.

19Then the protective man spoke and everyone that was at the scene heard, “Oh you wicked men, have you not read in that book that what God has put together let no man set apart?!” 20Ssempa retorted, “You witch, that law holds it for a man joined to a woman.”

21Then the man asked, “Even a shepherd does not know? Is it not written by Samuel in that book that the souls of David and Jonathan were married into one by the Lord? Do you not read also that Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself, and Jonathan loved him back as himself?

22Ssempa was enraged by his questions and he shouted back, “You are very immoral! A man can only find passionate love in women!”

23The man replied, “Are you a shepherd? Is it not found in that holy book that David lamented at the funeral that Jonathan’s love to him was more wonderful, surpassing that of women? Are you suggesting that David was an immoral man?” 24Because the men of Wakandah did not respond, he continued, “Therefore, I say unto you again, the hearts my father has bound together, let no man set apart.
  
25Christopher did not doubt anymore; he pulled on Ssemmpa’s robes and whispered in his ears, “I see the Lord! This is the Lord!” 26But Ssempa was vexed to hear this and he pushed him away; then he turned to the man and asked, “Who are you to say such blasphemy?”

27The man got up and told the lads to get on their feet too; but they failed. So he knelt and touched Prince Semugoma’s knees, and when he asked him to get on his feet, the prince did not need any support. And it was the same for Kiyemba.

28Christopher was awe-struck. The man he saw was Jesus drew the prince into his arms and kissed him on the forehead and said, “Be blessed my son”.  29Then he made a mark where he kissed. He repeated this for the other lad and both their lives were fully restored.

30Mary was enthralled and she ran to the trio and embraced them saying, “Oh, my John, thank you for saving their lives!” The man replied, “Glory to God, I experience holiness when I do what Jesus would do”. Then he said to the lads, “Come inside and I will give you clean robes”.

31Christopher heard when she called him John and he was confused. 32Suddenly, he started a lamentation with his hands on his head:
“Woe unto us, I have seen the face of the Christ that died on the cross!
“Woe unto us, the savior has been in our midst!”
“Emmanuel! Emmanuel! Emanuel!”

33The men of Wakandah were irritated by his lamentation and they walked away from him. They were very disappointed that the work of their hands had been undone and they feared for themselves when they returned to the callous king.

34And so Christopher witnessed what had been revealed in the vision to John the Apostle that God would protect his people from the worst persecution and they would be marked on their foreheads for the Kingdom of God in heaven. 35He also came to be called Emmanuel because of his lamentation.

Click here to read EMMANUEL 1: 1-35 - King Order's Son's Queer Lover to be Cast into Lion's Den

Disclaimer: The Book of Emmanuel is divinely inspired through a dream. Any similarities of names of characters in the story to real people is a coincidence, and not based on them.

King Orders Son’s Queer Lover to be Cast into Lion’s Den


Emmanuel: 1 1-31 WWJDV
1 In the Kingdom of Wakandah set on seven hills, the girls competed to catch the eye of King Ronald Mwanda’s handsome and only son, Prince Paulo Semugoma. 2But the prince’s eyes coldly floated past their prowling scheming eyes, and he did not invite any girl to his royal suite.

3They started to believe that it was water that flowed in his veins. 4Later, a gossip breezed in the hills that the prince engaged in abhorrent practices with Kiyemba, the palace page who liked to recite poetry. 5Soon it came to the callous king’s ear and his anger burnt fiercely against his son, and he waited for him to return from hunting.

6Mwanda scolded him at the entrance of the palace saying, “You perverted son of a shameful woman, what wicked spirit dwells in you to bring great scorn to my Kingdom?" 7So he ordered his guards to throw Kiyemba – who always accompanied the prince – into the lion’s den. 8But even before he completed his order, Kiyemba jumped off his horse and ran away faster than the arrows that were pelted at him. 9The sun had slept so he easily disappeared in the pitch darkness.

10A couple of days later, unaccompanied Semugoma finally found Kiyemba hiding in the valley of the hill on the south. 11Kiyemba was hungry and weak, and had two large septic arrow wounds on his buttocks.

12Fearing for his own life, Kiyemba dismissed him and forbade him from returning lest the palace dogs track him to the hiding place. 13The prince was very distraught as he obeyed his page who was a couple of years older.
14The following day, when the sun had disappeared behind the hills, Semugoma fooled the palace guards and escaped from the palace with food and medicinal herbs and returned to him. 15Kiyemba implored the prince to return to the palace after he had fed him and treated him.

16But Semugoma swiped his finger across the earth then across his wet tongue and said, “By the God of Abraham, the God of Jacob and all our grandfathers, I beseech you not to send me back to my father. 17From this moment on, where you are, there I will be, where you go, there I will go, where you die, there will I be buried. 18May the Lord do so to me, and worse, if anything but death should part you and me.” 

19Kiyemba saw the determination in his face and although he knew that the king must have set his dogs upon the hills already, his lips were sealed. 20There was no safe home in Wakandah where they could go to.

21That evening, they set out towards the city where the great Nile river poured out of the ground. 22But their tribulation was great because Kiyemba was frail, so when they came to the square on the outskirts of Wakandah Kingdom, they lay there for the night.

23On her way home, a village woman saw the young men who lay on the benches of the square, and they were shivering. 24She asked them, “What brings you to suffer the demons of the night?” 

25There was compassion in her voice so Kiyemba said, “The Prince and I are looking for a place to stay where the king’s men will not find us. 26Prince Semugoma left the palace and has vowed to be with me till death do we part and, by God, it is well with my soul”.

27There was silence and, after several heartbeats, the woman said, “Peace be to you children of God; my husband and I are only a few days old in this land but God forbid that he should reject you to sleep under our roof tonight. 28If that should happen, may my hands grow so short that I, Mary, will not be able to scratch my back”. 29And so she led them to her home, and they washed and ate.

30As they lay down their heads to sleep – before her husband returned, all the men of the kingdom, both young and old, came from all over the hills and surrounded the house. 31They were guided by dogs and commanded by Daudi Bahati and the infamous Marteen Ssempa; and they pounded on the door shouting, “Open the door or we shall force ourselves in”.

Click here to read EMMANUEL 2: 1-35 - Jesus Rescues Queer Couple from Mob Justice and Blesses them

Disclaimer: The Book of Emmanuel is divinely inspired through a dream. Any similarities of names of characters in the story to real people is a coincidence, and not based on them.

Monday 11 June 2018

Poem: I Cry for Orlando



I cry
For love.
Twelfth June
Twenty sixteen,
Queer men kissed
Omar Mateen Seethed.
Fed on rancid seeds of hate
In his hands, he held their fate.
Oh, the queer pearls we lost,
Forty-nine souls the cost.
That dark Latino night
We froze in fright.
Oh, Orlando,
For you
I cry.

- End-

Orlando Pulse Club Mass shooting

On June 12, 2016, Omar Mateen, a 29-year-old security guard, killed 49 people and wounded 53 others in a terrorist attack inside Pulse, a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida United States. Orlando Police Department officers shot and killed him after a three hour standoff.

Pulse was hosting a "Latin Night" and thus most of the victims were Latinos. It is the deadliest incident of violence against LGBT people in U.S history and the deadliest terrorist attack in the U.S. since the September 11 attacks in 2001. 

At the time, it was the deadliest mass shooting by a single shooter in the U.S., being surpassed the following year by the Las Vegas shooting.  

This poem is a tribute to the fallen innocent pearls. Commentary from Wikipedia. 

Wednesday 23 May 2018

A Queer Shock and the Handicap of all Right-handers.



Several years ago at College, my best friend Joseph Mayanja convinced me to attend a class with him to check out his teacher. Joseph knew I was not keenly interested in Geography but he tempted me, saying that I would miss great “optical nutrition” of watching his new teacher as he wrote on the blackboard. He refused to divulge details of the marvel about the teacher.

Mr. Denison Obua his new teacher was only a week old at the school and he would not know all the students in his class. I sneaked into the lecture theater with Joseph, and we sat next to each other at the back row of the reclining hall.

Not long after we had sat, Denison - about 32, walked into the room in haste and quickly took his seat at the front while greeting the class – the cheerful baritone rousing my unsuspecting heart to beat at the melodious concerto of his voice that reverberated in my head and distracted my attention.

Then, a  pestering tap on my hand shook me out of my distant look through the window - It was Joseph and his stern look said, “keep your eyes on the board!” I returned my eyes to the front of the lecture theater. Denison had finished settling in at his desk to start the lesson.

He stood up and faced the blackboard - he was lanky, about 6ft tall, with long athletic limbs, broad shoulders and small, round firm butt cheeks. His body silently sought my attention, gently courting my heart to drift across the room to dance a private tango with him and whisper into his ears.

At that moment, I reckoned this was the motive of my bosom friend’s desire to taunt my gullible queer heart by inviting me to this class. I turned to Joseph to acknowledge the success of his naughty scheme - but he returned a sterner look that demanded me to focus on the board.

Queer shock

Confused, and the fact that I detested Geography notwithstanding, I begrudgingly obeyed his unspoken instruction and turned to look at the blackboard. Denison had just started writing the topic of the day on the board and immediately, my erotic fantasy was stabbed by what my eyes beheld!

With the chalk stick peculiarly held between the thumb and his fingers of his left hand, Denison’s posture looked very weird as he wrote on the blackboard, standing mid-way the breadth of the two-and-a-half-meter board in a fixed midway position. He wrote pretty fast, only his head following through the forward slanting letters he was depositing on the board. This accentuated his queer posture.

Then something totally unexpected happened when the sentence was midway – Denison swiftly switched the chalk stick to his right hand and continued while maintaining the aesthetic calligraphic handwriting and maintaining the horizontal line of the words.

At the end of the sentence, he switched the chalk stick back to his left hand and without moving from the mid-position he stretched his left hand and started to underline the topic, then switching to the right hand again when he got to the mid-position and finishing off the line without changing its course or his position!

I was dumbfounded by the seamless transfer and consistent delivery of both his hands! A quick scan of the room revealed that all the students seemed excited by their new teacher’s blackboard antics and so I turned to Joseph to register my amazement at Denison’s gift – Joseph was already watching me with a wry smile and a sense of satisfaction. He replied my awe-struck face with an acknowledging wink.

The handicap of all right-handers

As the squeaky sound of the chalk against the blackboard echoed in my ears, and the image of the exhilarated students faded, Denison’s ambidextrous advantage elicited a special sense of natural disability of my left-hand that saddened me.

The largest majority of people are right-handers and are disabled to the extent that if they tried to use the left hand to write, the results will likely turn out to be very laughable scribbling of a three-year old! Left-handers are disabled the same way in their right hand.

It would seem therefore that exclusive right-handedness or left-handedness are disadvantaged handwriting orientations for people with writing disabilities in the left and right hands respectively.

Society once demonized left-handedness and the selfish right handers designed human lifestyle and technology to fit their own majority orientation. Humans have since changed their negative perceptions about lefties. What is also true is that there is the increasing need to be very versatile with both hands and feet be it sports, at home or at the work place.

The distinctive excellence of greats like Kobe Bryant, LeBron James and Christiano Ronaldo is attributed to this ability. Perhaps soon we shall reckon that the future belongs to the ambidextrous minority.

Ambidextrous Chemistry teacher: It doesn't mater which hand!

Wednesday 16 May 2018

Poem: Endless Tears




ENDLESS TEARS - By Christopher Emmanuel

I hear
The silent cry
Of the rainbow children.
They are buried alive
In fragile closets.

I hear
The silent cry
Of my trans cousins.
They are trapped inside
Their beautiful being

Their tears,
Endless Rivers
Behind their masks
Washing away
Their pride.

If you hear
My silent noise,
Beckon thy friendly allies.
Together, we can stop
The endless tears.
Bold alliances
Solidarity.

- End - 

About IDAHOBIT

17th May is International Day Against Homophobia Bi-phobia and Trans-phobia. This year's theme is Alliances for Solidarity,

This poem has been specially written to mark IDAHOBIT 2018. Be a part of the push to foster bold alliances for the needed solidarity - Share widely!

Thursday 19 April 2018

Why the White Fathers left Buganda: Unfettered Queer Sex



On 17 February 1879, after a treacherous voyage across Lake Victoria Nyanza, two Europeans on a mission finally arrived at the court of Buganda Kingdom in the interior of East Africa. The Kingdom was to be their new life station. But one morning, just three years later, they packed their bags and left!

The two Europeans, Father Simeon Lourdel and Brother Amans, were part of a team of five French Catholics from the Society of the Missionaries of Africa, commonly known as White Fathers, led by Father Léon Livinhac. The team set off from Marseille in France, arriving at the East African coast after several months and then crossing into the interior of Africa to the great Buganda.

They were on assignment by the founder of the White Fathers, Archbishop Charles Lavigerie, who harbored ambitions of securing the Nile for France and then spreading Catholicism to greater parts of Africa.

British missionaries from the (Anglican) Church Missionary Society had arrived at the court of the Buganda Kingdom two years ahead of Lavigerie’s team and were the first European missionaries in this interior part of Africa. They were sent in response to an open letter from King Muteesa I to Queen Victoria, prompted by British explorers, requesting to send more white men to teach his people how to read and write.

Lavigerie was suspicious of the agenda of the British in Buganda Kingdom – the biggest and most powerful kingdom in pre-colonial Uganda and so he sent his team.

The Mission

Lavigerie’s instruction to the team was that they should convince Kabaka Muteesa I to become Catholic. Then, they were to establish a base in his kingdom which was to be used as a launch pad of Catholicism to the greater part of Central Africa. The kingdom was strategically located for his mission.

Lavigerie reckoned that focusing on the overbearing king would automatically win them souls from the king’s subjects, without preaching a single word to the individual Africans. This would help them gain significant ground over their Anglican rivals who had arrived at the Kingdom earlier.

The friendly reception the White Fathers received at the palace and the king’s offer of prime land at Rubaga near the palace for the white men to settle boosted their hope for the mission. But soon, that hope begun to fade very quickly.

Frustrations

Shortly after they had arrived, the White Fathers observed that the king was a cunning man. It became apparent that the king was going to be a hard animal to pin down to the Catholic faith because he was not willing to commit to any single religion. Converting his subjects was therefore going to be quite some work. Additionally, he seemed to give them liberty to choose which foreign faith to take on.

Writing in his book, The Catholic Church in the Buddu Province of Buganda, 1879-1925, Fr. John Mary Waliggo recounts how, in September 1879, seven months after the Catholic missionaries had arrived, Muteesa asked the Anglican missionaries to baptize him. Just one month later, he requested the Catholic White Fathers to do the same. The following month, he was seen praying with the Muslims. By the close of that year he had ditched all the competing foreign religions and reverted to invoking the spirits of his local gods!

Yet more frustration was on its way to the Catholic missionaries in Buganda. From Algiers, the operations base of the White Fathers, Lavigerie sent a message to them, instructing the Fathers to observe a mandatory requirement to baptize a convert only after an incubation period of four years following thorough assessment for good behavior and a commitment to monogamy.

Father Lourdel reckoned that it was going to be harder to hold away baptism from the intelligent and impatient Baganda who had already begun to ask deep questions about the faith. The White Fathers, already disappointed in their failure to lock down the polygamous king, and fearful that they would lose their converts to the other religions, silently defied Lavigerie’s order and baptized the converts when they deemed it fitting.

Licentious Africans

On 9 November 1880, Charles Pearson, an Anglican missionary to Uganda, visited the White Fathers and he recounted to them a shocking event where he witnessed the most abominable scene he ever saw with his eyes a few days earlier.

According to The Diaries of the White Fathers, compiled by Joel Bertrand, 2014, Pearson recounted how on 5 November when he was at the king’s court, Muteesa told men at the court to undress, then his prime minister measured their penises to determine the winner. Later, the king ordered the winner to masturbate until he ejaculated which excited him and the people who were there. Pearson was greatly shocked.

The White Fathers who pioneered Catholicism in Uganda

Embarrassed, Pearson left in haste, lest God’s anger burnt against the people at the royal court and he was caught in the consequences of His wrath. When the White Fathers heard this, they reckoned that this was a cursed land for such abomination to happen in the open.

Later on, the White Fathers became terribly disturbed by what they begun to suspect about the boys in the orphanage which they had started shortly after arriving. They suspected that some of the boys were engaging in homosexual practices.

They believed that the orphans picked the habit from the influence of the boys of the royal palace in the neighborhood. Homosexual practices were not uncommon and they went on unfettered within the king’s palace. 

Like the voyeurism of the king, they were saddened to observe that these Africans did not find such acts abhorrent. In fact, the way the subjects traditionally addressed their king strongly affirmed the accommodation of such sexual expression.

“All subjects, whether male or female, referred to the Kabaka as ‘Bbaffe’, meaning “our husband”. He had powers over their lives and their sexuality.

At the end of July 1882, the White Fathers caught one of the orphans called Cyprian red-handed engaging in homosexual acts with another orphan. When the lad was quizzed, he gave a harrowing account of his addiction to homosexual acts with the other orphans. It shocked the men of God that almost all the boys at the orphanage were engaging in homosexuality willingly.

By Mid-October, they realized that no matter what they did – including isolating the lead culprits, the boys had ingenious ways of meeting to respond to their raging hormones, and this was frustrating. The missionaries then believed that the devil protected the lads.

Even the surrounding communities were grossly uninhibited and the people freely expressed their sexuality and sexual appetites. The men of God reckoned they dwelt in the devil’s haven. They became very uncomfortable living within such communities and they contemplated leaving.

On 18 October, they embarked on a novena – a devotional prayer that was to be repeated for 9 successive days.

Mission Abandoned

In the last week of October, according to The Diaries of the White Fathers, the missionaries committed to dedicate the last three days of the novena, specifically to seek God’s guidance on whether they should stay or leave, or just start another mission elsewhere.

On 27 October, the last day of the novena, Father Lourdel and Brother Amans, as well as all the other White Fathers who had joined them in June 1879, unanimously voted to leave licentious Buganda and prayed for God’s affirmation of the decision.

Later that day after the vote, they also learnt that their orphans had been involved in a connivance with other boys who attended confirmation classes at the mission to steal their property, and that King Muteesa may have encouraged the thefts. At that moment they did not wait for God’s response – they packed their bags and within a few days, they set sail on Lake Victoria without looking back! It was sudden. It was surprising.

Concealing a Negative Legacy

The common story about the White Fathers’ mission in Buganda is ambiguous and brief in the part explaining their hasty withdrawal. It is a narration that simply mentions that they abandoned the mission because their orphans had become unmanageable and were entrenched in homosexual practices.

The details behind this story are not known until you find and dig into the diaries of the White Fathers.

The foregoing story – recounted from the diaries which are kept in Rome in the central house of the White Fathers, places the story in the prevailing context. It reveals a blissfully unaware pre-colonial African society whose people freely expressed their sexuality to the point that the open voyeurism of the Muteesa I was not taboo. Even homosexual practices were neither abhorred nor punished.

Unfortunately, pre-colonial Ugandans had never recorded their own history because they were illiterate. When the Catholic Fathers were invited to come back to Buganda several years later, they made the rejection of homosexuality the cornerstone of their preaching. In so doing they, sowed the lethal seeds of homophobia in the people of Uganda that remains entrenched to this day.

Inevitably, the sexual tolerance of same gender expression was obliterated from African history when bigoted writers distorted the truth of this history to cover up the negative legacy of colonization.

Wednesday 28 March 2018

5 Reasons Why I Support Pope Francis to Change the Lord's Prayer.


Pope Francis: I shall not worship an evil God.








I have always been perturbed by the idea of worshiping God when he endorses murder, violence, rape, plunder and even prejudice. Little wonder therefore that I was excited when Pope Francis stepped on religious toes by faulting The Perfect Prayer of Christians and calling for it to be changed. 

The pope last year revealed in an interview with an Italian media house, TV2000, that the English wording, “Do not lead us into temptation”, in the Lord’s Prayer as it is more commonly known, is a mistranslation of the original words of God’s holy son Jesus when he taught his disciples how to pray.

Pope Francis stated that God does not cause us to sin, as the words suggest, explaining that “this is Satan’s department”. He believes that when we pray, we should petition God to protect us from falling into sin by Satan’s temptation. He therefore suggested the words, “Do not let us fall into temptation” which have already been adopted in the French liturgy to replace the misleading words.

A debate has ensued, in the interest of defending and preserving original scripture on one side, and challenging the inerrancy of the Bible on the other. To very many conservative Christians, the idea of altering the Bible is abominable and many have even questioned the depth of the pope’s theology. Nonetheless, the following are my reasons why I believe the pope should be supported to change the Lord's prayer.

1. I shall not worship an evil God!

Evil behavior is when you sin against other people and includes murder, theft, adultery, and a host of other wicked acts. Essentially, it is a lack of goodness. I shall not worship a god who creates evil, behaves in an evil manner and blesses evil. I shall not worship such a god who is fiercely brutal and destructive when angry.

In the Book of Genesis, a story is told when all the men of the city of Sodom gathered and attacked Lot's home with the intention of gang-raping two male angels that he had hosted that evening. Even though their heinous and inhospitable plot was averted, God unleashed missiles of burning sulphur on Sodom and Gomorrah after evacuating Lot and his family, destroying all the people and vegetation on the land.

Evil Deed: God launches missiles of burning sulphur on Sodom and Gomorrah.







Also in the Book of Joshua 10, God participates in mass murder by hurling large hailstones at the already defeated and retreating enemies of the Israelites at Gibeon. That day, on Joshua's command, God stopped the sun from setting for an extra full day so that Joshua could completely annihilate his enemies. 

In the Book of Exodus 32, God commands the army of Israel to mercilessly murder their own brothers, companions, neighbors and sons in their camp. Because they obeyed his command, God set them apart and blessed them that day. There are numerous other incidences where God creates, actively participates and blesses evil deeds but we can talk about these another day.

I worship a God of love and peace – a God who desires me to love him with all my might and also to love my neighbors as I love myself. I do not worship a God who endorses murder, violence, rape, plunder and even prejudice. Like Pope Francis, I shall not worship a God such as this who is evil.

2. We should dare to address the contradiction of an evil God.

Besides the incidences cited earlier, which clearly demonstrate that God can lead man to evil, there are also contradicting incidences in the Bible which confuse us on who actually is responsible for our evil actions. Take for example the story of David conducting a census of the fighting men of Israel. This story is narrated in 1 Chronicles 21, and again in 2 Samuel 24. Both stories are consistent that David instructed Joab to “Go number Israel and Judah”.

Now, we know that Israel did not belong to David and it was sinful to count what you did not own. For this reason, God unleashed a plague on Israel. And yet, a glaring contradiction of who led David to sin cannot be missed when the two stories are juxtaposed.

Contradiction: Is God interchangeable with Satan?






Satan incited David in the story narrated in book of Chronicles and yet it was God himself in the story that is recounted in the book of Samuel. And the questions arise: Is God interchangeable with Satan? Are they one and the same? Is mistranslation of original scripture an absolute impossibility? Can this contradiction also be explained away by the science of speculative and ambiguous contextualization? 

We should dare to paraphrase the Lord's prayer to redeem any instance in which God is perceived as the motivator of sin. But again, if that God is indeed the motivator of sin, I shall not worship him.

3. Christians are in a phase of denial!

A person in denial is one who is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting it is not true even in a sea of overwhelming evidence.

The fact is that the Bible is evidently clear on its depiction of the evil nature of God and yet sin is perceived as the as the sole mission of Satan working against God’s divine purpose for humanity.

Unfortunately, unlike Pope Francis, many Christians - including religious archetypes and bible scholars, are repressive and conservatively blind to such ambiguities and contradictions. They act deaf when rational or progressive voices debunk their speculative, inconsistent and ambiguous contextualization.

Thankfully, denial is an expected and necessary stage on the journey to acceptance of reality. As a typical stage, it provides a sense of hope for the evolution of theology and spiritual adaptation. For posterity, Pope Francis has my back!

4. Raise conscience about prejudice that is against humanity.

When Christians begin to deal with understanding and accepting contextual ambiguities and contradictions about God’s role in sin management, it will open their conscience to other instances where religious prejudice contradicts with ideals of modern humanity.

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) individuals, for example, have suffered religious ostracization for centuries based on a set of what have been referred to as “clobber passages” in the Bible. Success in paraphrasing the contentious words in the Lord’s Prayer to align contemporary divine perceptions with cherished human ideals will stimulate Christians to reflect on the pope’s other controversial divine cautions such as the one he revealed on the issue of gays:
"If someone is gay and searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?" 

Although these words by Pope Francis caused flutters when he said them in 2013, they have begun to change the church, which has become less caustic to LGBT individuals. 

Generally, there has been significant global movement where many nations are making progress towards acceptance and inclusiveness of these sexual minorities to the point of (sometimes) encouraging same-sex civil unions. However, the density of intolerance remains highest in conservative Christian and Islamic nations. 
  
5. To save the death of traditional Christianity!

The sad truth is that traditional Christianity, particularly the Roman Catholic church, the biggest of the mainline denominations, continues to suffer a large number of adherents in the developed world abandoning it to agnosticism and atheism! The faith is not motivating adherents or producing relevant change. Neither can it explain life’s biggest spiritual questions, and yet it holds a multitude of unresolved contradictions - some conflicting with human ideals, which are not in tandem with new knowledge.

Although Christianity is still able to post high growth rates largely on account of high fertility rates and conversions, notably in sub-Saharan Africa where its future lies, the inability to satisfy these spiritual voids is causing a rapid dwindling of the faith in the liberal developed world.
A 2015 Pew Research Center study revealed that, on average in the US and UK, the percentage of people without a religious preference doubles every decade! At this rate, Christianity will cease to have any authority and influence on the global scene in the next 50 years!

The pope should therefore be supported to stimulate the evolution of theology and avert the effect of the increasing irrelevance of traditional Christianity to humanity. Presently, Pentecostal churches, not being under a central governance system, remain a safe haven. They have the freedom to elect the portions of scripture they deem relevant to their faith system, and have already largely excluded the Lord’s Prayer in their lifestyle.

We may never be able to assess the cumulative impact of wrongly petitioning to God through the Lord's prayer, while accusing him of being evil for the span of life that Christians have recited that prayer, but better late than never. So Pope Francis, who the Roman Catholic church members believe is Saint Peter’s apostolic successor, and therefore holds the keys to heaven, should be supported to change the Lord’s Prayer for Christianity’s sake, if for no other reason. 

Meanwhile this blogger in support of Pope Francis has decided he will not “worship a God who induces temptation” and has terminated the use of this prayer, and has updated his faith system accordingly.

Over to you, what do you say?

Gay Friendly Destinations - Book Here!

Popular Posts