.jump-link{ display:none }
Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts

Thursday, 19 April 2018

Why the White Fathers left Buganda: Unfettered Queer Sex



On 17 February 1879, after a treacherous voyage across Lake Victoria Nyanza, two Europeans on a mission finally arrived at the court of Buganda Kingdom in the interior of East Africa. The Kingdom was to be their new life station. But one morning, just three years later, they packed their bags and left!

The two Europeans, Father Simeon Lourdel and Brother Amans, were part of a team of five French Catholics from the Society of the Missionaries of Africa, commonly known as White Fathers, led by Father Léon Livinhac. The team set off from Marseille in France, arriving at the East African coast after several months and then crossing into the interior of Africa to the great Buganda.

They were on assignment by the founder of the White Fathers, Archbishop Charles Lavigerie, who harbored ambitions of securing the Nile for France and then spreading Catholicism to greater parts of Africa.

British missionaries from the (Anglican) Church Missionary Society had arrived at the court of the Buganda Kingdom two years ahead of Lavigerie’s team and were the first European missionaries in this interior part of Africa. They were sent in response to an open letter from King Muteesa I to Queen Victoria, prompted by British explorers, requesting to send more white men to teach his people how to read and write.

Lavigerie was suspicious of the agenda of the British in Buganda Kingdom – the biggest and most powerful kingdom in pre-colonial Uganda and so he sent his team.

The Mission

Lavigerie’s instruction to the team was that they should convince Kabaka Muteesa I to become Catholic. Then, they were to establish a base in his kingdom which was to be used as a launch pad of Catholicism to the greater part of Central Africa. The kingdom was strategically located for his mission.

Lavigerie reckoned that focusing on the overbearing king would automatically win them souls from the king’s subjects, without preaching a single word to the individual Africans. This would help them gain significant ground over their Anglican rivals who had arrived at the Kingdom earlier.

The friendly reception the White Fathers received at the palace and the king’s offer of prime land at Rubaga near the palace for the white men to settle boosted their hope for the mission. But soon, that hope begun to fade very quickly.

Frustrations

Shortly after they had arrived, the White Fathers observed that the king was a cunning man. It became apparent that the king was going to be a hard animal to pin down to the Catholic faith because he was not willing to commit to any single religion. Converting his subjects was therefore going to be quite some work. Additionally, he seemed to give them liberty to choose which foreign faith to take on.

Writing in his book, The Catholic Church in the Buddu Province of Buganda, 1879-1925, Fr. John Mary Waliggo recounts how, in September 1879, seven months after the Catholic missionaries had arrived, Muteesa asked the Anglican missionaries to baptize him. Just one month later, he requested the Catholic White Fathers to do the same. The following month, he was seen praying with the Muslims. By the close of that year he had ditched all the competing foreign religions and reverted to invoking the spirits of his local gods!

Yet more frustration was on its way to the Catholic missionaries in Buganda. From Algiers, the operations base of the White Fathers, Lavigerie sent a message to them, instructing the Fathers to observe a mandatory requirement to baptize a convert only after an incubation period of four years following thorough assessment for good behavior and a commitment to monogamy.

Father Lourdel reckoned that it was going to be harder to hold away baptism from the intelligent and impatient Baganda who had already begun to ask deep questions about the faith. The White Fathers, already disappointed in their failure to lock down the polygamous king, and fearful that they would lose their converts to the other religions, silently defied Lavigerie’s order and baptized the converts when they deemed it fitting.

Licentious Africans

On 9 November 1880, Charles Pearson, an Anglican missionary to Uganda, visited the White Fathers and he recounted to them a shocking event where he witnessed the most abominable scene he ever saw with his eyes a few days earlier.

According to The Diaries of the White Fathers, compiled by Joel Bertrand, 2014, Pearson recounted how on 5 November when he was at the king’s court, Muteesa told men at the court to undress, then his prime minister measured their penises to determine the winner. Later, the king ordered the winner to masturbate until he ejaculated which excited him and the people who were there. Pearson was greatly shocked.

The White Fathers who pioneered Catholicism in Uganda

Embarrassed, Pearson left in haste, lest God’s anger burnt against the people at the royal court and he was caught in the consequences of His wrath. When the White Fathers heard this, they reckoned that this was a cursed land for such abomination to happen in the open.

Later on, the White Fathers became terribly disturbed by what they begun to suspect about the boys in the orphanage which they had started shortly after arriving. They suspected that some of the boys were engaging in homosexual practices.

They believed that the orphans picked the habit from the influence of the boys of the royal palace in the neighborhood. Homosexual practices were not uncommon and they went on unfettered within the king’s palace. 

Like the voyeurism of the king, they were saddened to observe that these Africans did not find such acts abhorrent. In fact, the way the subjects traditionally addressed their king strongly affirmed the accommodation of such sexual expression.

“All subjects, whether male or female, referred to the Kabaka as ‘Bbaffe’, meaning “our husband”. He had powers over their lives and their sexuality.

At the end of July 1882, the White Fathers caught one of the orphans called Cyprian red-handed engaging in homosexual acts with another orphan. When the lad was quizzed, he gave a harrowing account of his addiction to homosexual acts with the other orphans. It shocked the men of God that almost all the boys at the orphanage were engaging in homosexuality willingly.

By Mid-October, they realized that no matter what they did – including isolating the lead culprits, the boys had ingenious ways of meeting to respond to their raging hormones, and this was frustrating. The missionaries then believed that the devil protected the lads.

Even the surrounding communities were grossly uninhibited and the people freely expressed their sexuality and sexual appetites. The men of God reckoned they dwelt in the devil’s haven. They became very uncomfortable living within such communities and they contemplated leaving.

On 18 October, they embarked on a novena – a devotional prayer that was to be repeated for 9 successive days.

Mission Abandoned

In the last week of October, according to The Diaries of the White Fathers, the missionaries committed to dedicate the last three days of the novena, specifically to seek God’s guidance on whether they should stay or leave, or just start another mission elsewhere.

On 27 October, the last day of the novena, Father Lourdel and Brother Amans, as well as all the other White Fathers who had joined them in June 1879, unanimously voted to leave licentious Buganda and prayed for God’s affirmation of the decision.

Later that day after the vote, they also learnt that their orphans had been involved in a connivance with other boys who attended confirmation classes at the mission to steal their property, and that King Muteesa may have encouraged the thefts. At that moment they did not wait for God’s response – they packed their bags and within a few days, they set sail on Lake Victoria without looking back! It was sudden. It was surprising.

Concealing a Negative Legacy

The common story about the White Fathers’ mission in Buganda is ambiguous and brief in the part explaining their hasty withdrawal. It is a narration that simply mentions that they abandoned the mission because their orphans had become unmanageable and were entrenched in homosexual practices.

The details behind this story are not known until you find and dig into the diaries of the White Fathers.

The foregoing story – recounted from the diaries which are kept in Rome in the central house of the White Fathers, places the story in the prevailing context. It reveals a blissfully unaware pre-colonial African society whose people freely expressed their sexuality to the point that the open voyeurism of the Muteesa I was not taboo. Even homosexual practices were neither abhorred nor punished.

Unfortunately, pre-colonial Ugandans had never recorded their own history because they were illiterate. When the Catholic Fathers were invited to come back to Buganda several years later, they made the rejection of homosexuality the cornerstone of their preaching. In so doing they, sowed the lethal seeds of homophobia in the people of Uganda that remains entrenched to this day.

Inevitably, the sexual tolerance of same gender expression was obliterated from African history when bigoted writers distorted the truth of this history to cover up the negative legacy of colonization.

Wednesday, 28 March 2018

5 Reasons Why I Support Pope Francis to Change the Lord's Prayer.


Pope Francis: I shall not worship an evil God.








I have always been perturbed by the idea of worshiping God when he endorses murder, violence, rape, plunder and even prejudice. Little wonder therefore that I was excited when Pope Francis stepped on religious toes by faulting The Perfect Prayer of Christians and calling for it to be changed. 

The pope last year revealed in an interview with an Italian media house, TV2000, that the English wording, “Do not lead us into temptation”, in the Lord’s Prayer as it is more commonly known, is a mistranslation of the original words of God’s holy son Jesus when he taught his disciples how to pray.

Pope Francis stated that God does not cause us to sin, as the words suggest, explaining that “this is Satan’s department”. He believes that when we pray, we should petition God to protect us from falling into sin by Satan’s temptation. He therefore suggested the words, “Do not let us fall into temptation” which have already been adopted in the French liturgy to replace the misleading words.

A debate has ensued, in the interest of defending and preserving original scripture on one side, and challenging the inerrancy of the Bible on the other. To very many conservative Christians, the idea of altering the Bible is abominable and many have even questioned the depth of the pope’s theology. Nonetheless, the following are my reasons why I believe the pope should be supported to change the Lord's prayer.

1. I shall not worship an evil God!

Evil behavior is when you sin against other people and includes murder, theft, adultery, and a host of other wicked acts. Essentially, it is a lack of goodness. I shall not worship a god who creates evil, behaves in an evil manner and blesses evil. I shall not worship such a god who is fiercely brutal and destructive when angry.

In the Book of Genesis, a story is told when all the men of the city of Sodom gathered and attacked Lot's home with the intention of gang-raping two male angels that he had hosted that evening. Even though their heinous and inhospitable plot was averted, God unleashed missiles of burning sulphur on Sodom and Gomorrah after evacuating Lot and his family, destroying all the people and vegetation on the land.

Evil Deed: God launches missiles of burning sulphur on Sodom and Gomorrah.







Also in the Book of Joshua 10, God participates in mass murder by hurling large hailstones at the already defeated and retreating enemies of the Israelites at Gibeon. That day, on Joshua's command, God stopped the sun from setting for an extra full day so that Joshua could completely annihilate his enemies. 

In the Book of Exodus 32, God commands the army of Israel to mercilessly murder their own brothers, companions, neighbors and sons in their camp. Because they obeyed his command, God set them apart and blessed them that day. There are numerous other incidences where God creates, actively participates and blesses evil deeds but we can talk about these another day.

I worship a God of love and peace – a God who desires me to love him with all my might and also to love my neighbors as I love myself. I do not worship a God who endorses murder, violence, rape, plunder and even prejudice. Like Pope Francis, I shall not worship a God such as this who is evil.

2. We should dare to address the contradiction of an evil God.

Besides the incidences cited earlier, which clearly demonstrate that God can lead man to evil, there are also contradicting incidences in the Bible which confuse us on who actually is responsible for our evil actions. Take for example the story of David conducting a census of the fighting men of Israel. This story is narrated in 1 Chronicles 21, and again in 2 Samuel 24. Both stories are consistent that David instructed Joab to “Go number Israel and Judah”.

Now, we know that Israel did not belong to David and it was sinful to count what you did not own. For this reason, God unleashed a plague on Israel. And yet, a glaring contradiction of who led David to sin cannot be missed when the two stories are juxtaposed.

Contradiction: Is God interchangeable with Satan?






Satan incited David in the story narrated in book of Chronicles and yet it was God himself in the story that is recounted in the book of Samuel. And the questions arise: Is God interchangeable with Satan? Are they one and the same? Is mistranslation of original scripture an absolute impossibility? Can this contradiction also be explained away by the science of speculative and ambiguous contextualization? 

We should dare to paraphrase the Lord's prayer to redeem any instance in which God is perceived as the motivator of sin. But again, if that God is indeed the motivator of sin, I shall not worship him.

3. Christians are in a phase of denial!

A person in denial is one who is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting it is not true even in a sea of overwhelming evidence.

The fact is that the Bible is evidently clear on its depiction of the evil nature of God and yet sin is perceived as the as the sole mission of Satan working against God’s divine purpose for humanity.

Unfortunately, unlike Pope Francis, many Christians - including religious archetypes and bible scholars, are repressive and conservatively blind to such ambiguities and contradictions. They act deaf when rational or progressive voices debunk their speculative, inconsistent and ambiguous contextualization.

Thankfully, denial is an expected and necessary stage on the journey to acceptance of reality. As a typical stage, it provides a sense of hope for the evolution of theology and spiritual adaptation. For posterity, Pope Francis has my back!

4. Raise conscience about prejudice that is against humanity.

When Christians begin to deal with understanding and accepting contextual ambiguities and contradictions about God’s role in sin management, it will open their conscience to other instances where religious prejudice contradicts with ideals of modern humanity.

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) individuals, for example, have suffered religious ostracization for centuries based on a set of what have been referred to as “clobber passages” in the Bible. Success in paraphrasing the contentious words in the Lord’s Prayer to align contemporary divine perceptions with cherished human ideals will stimulate Christians to reflect on the pope’s other controversial divine cautions such as the one he revealed on the issue of gays:
"If someone is gay and searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?" 

Although these words by Pope Francis caused flutters when he said them in 2013, they have begun to change the church, which has become less caustic to LGBT individuals. 

Generally, there has been significant global movement where many nations are making progress towards acceptance and inclusiveness of these sexual minorities to the point of (sometimes) encouraging same-sex civil unions. However, the density of intolerance remains highest in conservative Christian and Islamic nations. 
  
5. To save the death of traditional Christianity!

The sad truth is that traditional Christianity, particularly the Roman Catholic church, the biggest of the mainline denominations, continues to suffer a large number of adherents in the developed world abandoning it to agnosticism and atheism! The faith is not motivating adherents or producing relevant change. Neither can it explain life’s biggest spiritual questions, and yet it holds a multitude of unresolved contradictions - some conflicting with human ideals, which are not in tandem with new knowledge.

Although Christianity is still able to post high growth rates largely on account of high fertility rates and conversions, notably in sub-Saharan Africa where its future lies, the inability to satisfy these spiritual voids is causing a rapid dwindling of the faith in the liberal developed world.
A 2015 Pew Research Center study revealed that, on average in the US and UK, the percentage of people without a religious preference doubles every decade! At this rate, Christianity will cease to have any authority and influence on the global scene in the next 50 years!

The pope should therefore be supported to stimulate the evolution of theology and avert the effect of the increasing irrelevance of traditional Christianity to humanity. Presently, Pentecostal churches, not being under a central governance system, remain a safe haven. They have the freedom to elect the portions of scripture they deem relevant to their faith system, and have already largely excluded the Lord’s Prayer in their lifestyle.

We may never be able to assess the cumulative impact of wrongly petitioning to God through the Lord's prayer, while accusing him of being evil for the span of life that Christians have recited that prayer, but better late than never. So Pope Francis, who the Roman Catholic church members believe is Saint Peter’s apostolic successor, and therefore holds the keys to heaven, should be supported to change the Lord’s Prayer for Christianity’s sake, if for no other reason. 

Meanwhile this blogger in support of Pope Francis has decided he will not “worship a God who induces temptation” and has terminated the use of this prayer, and has updated his faith system accordingly.

Over to you, what do you say?

Gay Friendly Destinations - Book Here!

Popular Posts